top of page

The Church & Technology

I am currently reading Analog Church by Jay Y. Kim. The point of Kim’s book is not to argue against using technology in our churches, but to reserve technology for its proper purpose. A line Kim uses in his book is, “Digital informs; Analog transforms.” He goes on to clarify:

The truth is we need both. We need information. But information should always move us toward transformation. Information is the means; transformation is the end.[1]

So far, it is an interesting read.

Of particular note so far is Kim’s discussion of Marshall McLuhan’s (A philosopher in the 1960s) Four Laws of Media. According to Kim, McLuhan’s Four Laws of Media can be summarized as a series of questions to ask about any and every form of media:

1. What does it enhance, improve, or make possible?

2. What does it push aside or make obsolete?

3. What does it retrieve that was previously pushed aside or made obsolete?

4. What does it turn into when pushed to an extreme?

Kim illustrates:

Take the smartphone as an example. The smartphone enhanced the human capacity to communicate—specifically, to talk and to listen to one another. It also made it possible to access information at any time, with its constant connectivity to the internet. It pushed aside mobile phones and made home phones and payphones obsolete. Of the many things it retrieved, an obvious example is the camera; previously, even those who owned cameras, whether film or digital, rarely carried them around constantly, only bringing them along for specific occasions. But smartphones made photography and video capture a common, everyday occurrence for the masses.
Regarding the last question of the Four Laws, McLuhan stated that when a form of media is pushed to its extreme, it eventually reverses in on itself and works in direct opposition to the very human capacity it was originally intended to enhance. So in the case of the smartphone, its ability to extend the human capacity for communication (to talk and listen, while also being able to see one another, even across great distances) has reversed in on itself. It’s now commonplace for people to be sitting right in front of each other, at restaurants and coffee shops and dinner tables, and be totally disconnected from one another, not talking, not listening, not seeing, not communicating, and instead tethered to their devices.[2]

All of this consideration about media / technology has me thinking about the WARBC churches during the pandemic.

I wonder how your church is adjusting to the use of media during the pandemic? For some churches, the switch to livestreaming was seamless. But for other churches, the change was much more difficult.

I wonder how many churches who started streaming for the pandemic will continue streaming?

I also wonder about the responses your church has received from any technological change you were forced to make during this time?

Finally, how are you balancing the appeal (need?) for streaming services and the importance of in-person gathering? In other words, are you hearing from people that online service is good enough for them, or are you seeing people desire to gather in person over online?

Let me know what your church is experiencing and your thoughts about Kim’s premise that “Analog informs; Digital transforms.” I also would love to hear your feedback about McLuhan’s Four Laws of Media.

[1] Jay Y. Kim, Analog Church: Why We Need Real People, Places, and Things in the Digital Age. (Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic, an imprint of InterVarsity Press, 2020), 60. [2] Ibid., 40.




20 views2 comments

Recent Posts

See All

2 Comments


jeremydscott02
jeremydscott02
Jul 30, 2020

Thanks for sharing your experience with us, Mark! We started live-streaming 7 years ago primarily for parents who had to stay home with sick kids and for shut-ins. Having it set up made the transition a couple of months ago pretty easy for us.


With not being able to fully meet together per Dane County's emergency orders, having the livestream continues to be a good thing. But I do want to avoid the danger of undermining the importance of in-person gatherings.


Each church will have to make decisions according to their context. Tricky times, for sure!


Always appreciate your input!

Like

Mark Brooks
Mark Brooks
Jul 30, 2020

Very interesting! We shut off the livestream a few weeks after being back to gathering. There were some who expressed disappointment, but not a lot. We had also started a "Daily Devo" livestream based on our church's Bible reading plan. We discontinued for July-Aug at least and some have expressed that they really missed that. We may pick that up again in the Fall. I don't think I'm going in the direction of livestreaming our services long-term. I know it has some positives, but I want the focus to be on gathering and for people to know they are missing something when they don't actually gather. Having said that, I do think being to livestream during coronavirus wa…

Like
bottom of page